Age-Grading Calculator
Age-adjusted performance comparison (WMA 2015)
Race time
60.1 %
Locally competitive
Your performance corresponds to 60.1% of the expected world-class performance for your age.
Performance across ages
Almost everyone slows down over the years — that is normal and has nothing to do with effort. Age grading takes that effect out.
The result is a percentage: how close your time is to what is possible at your age and sex. It lets a 60-year-old compare directly with a 25-year-old.
How it is calculated
Age grading in % = (open-class world standard / age factor) / your time × 100. The age factor is 1.0 up to 35 and declines afterwards: men 1 − 0.005 × x − 0.00015 × x², women 1 − 0.0045 × x − 0.00012 × x², with x = age − 35.
The factor approximates the World Masters Athletics tables, which record for every age how much slower the world's best of that age are — so a 45:00 at 60 becomes comparable with a 45:00 at 25.
Example: male, 40 years, 10 km in 45:00 = 2700 s. Open standard for 10 km = 1577 s (26:17). x = 5, factor = 1 − 0.025 − 0.00375 = 0.971. Age standard = 1577 / 0.971 = 1624 s. Age grading = 1624 / 2700 × 100 = 60.1 %.
The rating: from 90 % world class, from 80 % national class, from 70 % regional class, from 60 % locally competitive, from 50 % good.
To calculate an age-graded performance you get an approximation here; the official tables differ by one to two percentage points depending on age.
How to read the percentage
Higher is stronger. Around 60 percent is already solid for a committed recreational runner; 80 percent and above sits at regional elite level.
The nice side effect: even as your times get slower with age, your age grade can rise. That is often the more honest feedback.
Frequently asked questions
- Where do the reference values come from?
- From the tables of the world masters athletics association, which hold a benchmark performance for every age group and distance.
- From what age is this worthwhile?
- For anyone. Below 30 the factor sits close to one, so little changes. It gets interesting from around 40.
- Does it apply to triathlon?
- The method comes from running and is designed for running distances. There is no comparably established table for triathlon.