Skip to main content

Cycling Power Calculator

Calculate and classify watts/kg

3.29 W/kg

Moderate (Recreational)

Training zones

Z1Active recovery
0127 W
Z2Endurance
129173 W
Z3Tempo
175207 W
Z4Threshold
209242 W
Z5VO2max
244276 W
Z6Anaerobic
278 W

Why watts per kilo?

A heavier rider needs more power to climb at the same speed. Watts alone therefore say little — only relative to body weight do riders become comparable.

The calculator divides your power by your weight and places the result on a scale from beginner to world class.

How it is calculated

Watts per kilogram = power in watts / body weight in kg. If the power you enter is a 20-minute value rather than your FTP, the calculator also estimates FTP with × 0.95.

On a climb it is not absolute power that counts but what each kilogram of body weight has to move — which is why W/kg is the number that lets riders of different builds compare.

Example: 230 W FTP at 70 kg. 230 / 70 = 3.29 W/kg — the calculator rates that as Moderate, solid recreational level.

The rating: from 3.2 W/kg Moderate, from 4.0 Good, from 5.0 Very Good, from 5.6 Excellent, from 6.4 World Class. The steps follow racing categories and refer to a 60-minute FTP.

To calculate W/kg, weigh yourself in the morning before eating — a 2 kg difference shifts the value at 230 W by almost 0.1 W/kg.

When the number matters

On a climb, watts per kilo decide almost everything. On the flat and in time trials absolute watts matter more, because air resistance dominates there.

A heavy rider can therefore be faster on the flat and slower uphill than a light one, at the same rating here.

Frequently asked questions

Which power value should I enter?
Your FTP is the most meaningful — power over roughly an hour. Short sprint numbers produce a figure that says nothing about endurance.
Is losing weight the faster route to higher watts per kilo?
On paper yes, in practice rarely. Lose too much and power goes with it, leaving you slower overall.
Why can't I reach professional numbers?
Because those combine decades of training, genetics and a full-time job. Comparing against your own value from a year ago is more useful.